Re: [webcomponents] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316)

As far as my understanding is correct, everyone looks okay with *Proposal 1* mentioned in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015OctDec/0149.html

Proposal 1 is:
> [E !important] > [D !important] > [C !important] > [style-attribute !important] > [B !important] > [A !important] > [A] > [style-attribute] > [B] > [C] > [D] > [E]

- *Proposal 1* doesn't conflict with @rune-opera 's proposal.
- Apple (@rniwa) likes Option2, which doesn't conflict *Proposal 1*. In W3C TPAC, we also had a casual chat that "Outer wins Inner" would make sense.
- @kojiishi suggested Option1, but the reason for that is for the compatibility issue in Blink. We are okay with *Proposal 1* if we can resolve the backward compatibility issue in Blink.

Thus, to have *Proposal 1* in the spec, the only remaining concern is the backward compatibility issue in Blink.
@TakayoshiKochi is investigation on that. We can update this issue if we can figure out something about that.




---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/316#issuecomment-153585700