Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)

In https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2015Jan/0260.html I attempted to explain the CSP "issue" to the WebAppSec WG. I still think `default()` should go.

@domenic suggests for the earlier issue that we allow mutating of `Response`'s internal `redirectToURL` slot at all times. We just need to carefully explain when the copy happens after which point it is obviously no longer observed on the original object.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/607#issuecomment-71646814

Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 13:25:50 UTC