Re: [webidl] Fix a typo in editorial note for @@toStringTag (#39)

well, it's not `Symbol.@@toStringTag` (which isn't defined), it's just the value property of the `Symbol` function called `toStringTag`, which is a read-only property whose value is the `@@toStringTag` well known symbol --- it seems kind of irrelevant. In terms of `@@toStringTag` uses on builtin object types, it's always configurable.

I believe this is deliberate, and it's unlikely to change now since that ship has pretty much sailed, but I can remove the "Not sure if that is deliberate." if that sounds good

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/39#issuecomment-70770339

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 01:43:19 UTC