- From: Ben Peters <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:16:59 -0800
- To: w3c/editing-explainer <editing-explainer@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 00:17:29 UTC
After reviewing the fallback plan with experts at Microsoft, we believe that this is not a good approach, even for V1. Users expect inline composition to work, and the fallback experience is not as good as the inline experience. Any serious consumer of contentEditable will expect inline composition. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing-explainer/issues/34#issuecomment-69673337
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 00:17:29 UTC