- From: David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:21:23 -0800
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2015 20:21:51 UTC
There are also 3 FIDO specs in [the submission](http://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/02/): [FIDO 2.0 Web API](https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/SUBM-fido-web-api-20151120/) [FIDO 2.0 Key Attestation Format](https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/SUBM-fido-key-attestation-20151120/) [FIDO 2.0 Signature Format](https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/SUBM-fido-signature-format-20151120/) My understanding is the JS API in 2.0 has been substantially modernized in terms of following best practices (promises, string vs. numeric constants) relative to 1.0. It's not yet clear whether we'll be able to avoid being stuck with 1.0. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/97#issuecomment-161422045
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2015 20:21:51 UTC