Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)

> OK. Note that you can already do this by having the dictionary in the IDL and then in prose converting the dictionary to a JS value and then structured cloning that value. It's a bit nonobvious, but quite possible.

Agree - it's certainly doable. Just figured it would be cleaner to take it out of prose. 

> Is this something people commonly want to do?

I don't think it's very common - but I've seen it come up a few times in various context/discussions. I'll see if I can gather more real examples over time. 

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/34#issuecomment-66954991