W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2012

[Bug 18611] Blob should support Transferable

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:21:58 +0000
Message-Id: <E1T2Wne-0005eN-GL@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org

--- Comment #2 from Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> 2012-08-18 00:21:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Second, I don't think it has been proven that this pattern is common enough
> that adding syntax sugar for it is warranted at this time.

It's not syntax sugar, it's an API simplification: as far as scripts are
concerned, neuterable, closable, transferable objects are are all the same
thing, yet the APIs are needlessly diverging, giving an inconsistent, piecemeal
API.  (Similarly, ArrayBuffer is missing .close.)

> Please don't file new bugs on this. If you want to keep discussing this, either
> keep commenting in existing bugs (you can even reopen them), or start a thread
> on the list.

I filed a new bug because reopening the one I saw (#17757) didn't make sense
(since it was just about a note).

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 August 2012 00:21:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:04:26 UTC