Re: [progress-events] loaded member misnamed?

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yesterday someone contacted me on IRC about implementing 
> XMLHttpRequest.upload from XMLHttpRequest Level 2. 

It was me :)
I'll go through XHR2 and PE tomorrow and give possibly more comments.

> It turns out that the 
> Progress Events specification is not generic enough for both uploading 
> and downloading as we agreed it should be long ago.
> 
> The ProgressEvent.loaded member should probably be defined in a more 
> abstract way and I would actually suggest to rename it to 
> ProgressEvent.transferred so it's clear that it is about transferred data.

Thanks, Anne, for bringing up this issue here already.

-Olli