- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 12:47:29 +1000
- To: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Cameron McCormack: > I thought it handled this case, but apparently not. In 4.1.16 it > currently says: > > If a host object expecting a boxed valuetype is passed an ECMAScript > Object value, the value must first be handled according to the rules > in this section corresponding to the IDL type being boxed. > > but I think it should be for any value other than null (since null is > handled in the previous paragraph). That would result in the undefined > value being stringified to "undefined", per 4.1.13. Fixed now. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2008 02:48:03 UTC