W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2008

RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]

From: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:22:41 -0700
To: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
CC: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>, IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team <ieajax@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <083D18C6B9B71F4CBCA7B76D97B7483102C681BD21@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> 

Agreed. I think it's entirely reasonable to call XDR by its full DOM name, XDomainRequest.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Brodie [mailto:stewart.brodie@antplc.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:47 AM
To: Sunava Dutta
Cc: Web API WG (public)
Subject: Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]

Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com> wrote:

> IE would like to propose XDR as a new (Rec-track) spec for the Web API WG.

Whatever you decide to do, please could you choose a different acronym, as
XDR is already used for encoding in RPC.

--
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 01:22:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 28 March 2008 01:22:53 GMT