On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:22:41 +0100, Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com> wrote: > Agreed. I think it's entirely reasonable to call XDR by its full DOM > name, XDomainRequest. Which, just as XMLHttpRequest is habitually shortened to XHR, will be shortened to XDR in the real world. I don't think we can avoid all name clashes - we should look at the one that are close in functionality and try to avoid those in particular. cheers Chaals > -----Original Message----- > From: Stewart Brodie [mailto:stewart.brodie@antplc.com] > Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com> wrote: > >> IE would like to propose XDR as a new (Rec-track) spec for the Web API >> WG. > > Whatever you decide to do, please could you choose a different acronym, > as XDR is already used for encoding in RPC. -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.comReceived on Friday, 28 March 2008 08:43:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 28 March 2008 08:43:52 GMT