- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:42:35 +0100
- To: "Sunava Dutta" <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, "Stewart Brodie" <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>, "IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team" <ieajax@microsoft.com>
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:22:41 +0100, Sunava Dutta
<sunavad@windows.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Agreed. I think it's entirely reasonable to call XDR by its full DOM
> name, XDomainRequest.
Which, just as XMLHttpRequest is habitually shortened to XHR, will be
shortened to XDR in the real world.
I don't think we can avoid all name clashes - we should look at the one
that are close in functionality and try to avoid those in particular.
cheers
Chaals
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Brodie [mailto:stewart.brodie@antplc.com]
> Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> IE would like to propose XDR as a new (Rec-track) spec for the Web API
>> WG.
>
> Whatever you decide to do, please could you choose a different acronym,
> as XDR is already used for encoding in RPC.
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 08:43:50 UTC