W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2008

Re: [svg-developers] Re: SVGt1.2: Text Box

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:05:32 +0000
Message-ID: <47DEB2EC.8080401@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: wwjw-svg@w3.org
CC: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, public-webapi@w3.org

~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:
> 
> which is simple to understand does not provide anything similar to:
> html form: action or method, which aywk do not require script.
>  and it is in this sense that I feel the SVGt1.2 spec is not acceptable.
> 

Wasn't the design philosophy of SVG the XML one, i.e. you mix namespaces 
to get non-graphical features.  I'm not sure if XFORMS is concrete 
enough, but otherwise one would use actual HTML forms.

Cross posted, so may fail or be delayed on some of the CCs.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 18:06:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 March 2008 18:06:42 GMT