W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > June 2008

Re: XHR LC comments

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:16:49 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.ub56ybht64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Tue, 27 May 2008 15:44:21 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 May 2008 14:29:16 +0200, Julian Reschke  
>> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> You're still avoiding the question whether the URL parameter can be an  
>>> IRI. I would assume it can't, in which case the spec should require it  
>>> to conform to RFC3986.
>>  It can. I made the specification more clear on this.
>
> - Is this actually implemented?

Yes. In Opera and Firefix it is, at least.


> - If the URL parameter can be a IRI, then somewhere later on we need to  
> state that it needs to be transformed to a URI before it's put on the  
> wire.

Added a transformation step as per 3.1 and also required throwing a  
SYNTAX_ERR in case of failure (ToASCII operation failure seems the most  
likely).


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2008 11:17:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 June 2008 11:17:29 GMT