On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:54:17 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > This is definitely a good question, one that I'd like to see addressed > too. > > I think that if the spec remains as is Firefox would likely fire events > that implements both the ProgressEvent interface and the LSProgressEvent > interface, but encourage people to use the ProgressEvent interface. > Possibly even by putting a message in the error console when the old > interface properties are accessed. If we want a different interface I think the progress events specification should be changed. XMLHttpRequest Level 2 simply uses whatever Progress Events 1.0 defines at this point and I'd like to keep it that way. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 11:00:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 April 2008 11:00:55 GMT