On 2007/10/04, at 6:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:20:53 +0200, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo- > inc.com> wrote: >> Well, if we get our act together in the HTTP-WG, hopefully you'll >> have a registry to refer to. > > Would this registry deal with dangerous methods such as TRACE or > CONNECT that can not be supported in an XMLHttpRequest > implementation? Or would these methods need to be called out in the > XMLHttpRequest specification or something? "Dangerous" is very much application-specific; what's dangerous to XHR is completely irrelevant to, for example, a proxy. So, no. > How does this registry help with arbitrary HTTP methods? Don't think it does. > I would very much like to solve the inconsistencies around HTTP > method support for XMLHttpRequest level 2. As would I. -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.comReceived on Monday, 8 October 2007 02:54:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:58 GMT