Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Carsten Orthbandt wrote: >> Bjoern Hoehrmann schrieb: >>> Why don't you use less &, <, and ]]> sequences in the content and wrap >>> it into <x>...</x>? >> If my response body is (literal example) >> >> ---snip--- >> ut:7325 >> ubc:0 >> ---snap--- >> >> there's obviously some hesitation to wrap that as >> >> ---snip--- >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> <x> >> ut:7325 >> ubc:0 >> </x> >> ---snap--- > > It would be sufficient to use <x>ut:7325,ubc:0</x>. The massive amount > of overhead generated by the connection setup and request and response > headers hardly compare to those 7 bytes. Or even <x ut="7325" ubc="0"/> , removing the need for a custom parser. Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 15 June 2007 09:08:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:23 UTC