On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:04:18 +0200, Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com> wrote: > So you just decided not to mention conformance requirements for the > URL at all? Did you actually read the relevant section? >> some implementations support other protocols besides HTTP (that >> functionality is not covered >> in this specification though) > > But nowhere is it made explicit (as far as I could see) which schemes > are actually covered in the specification. Right, as this is mostly up to implementations for this version. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Saturday, 14 October 2006 17:07:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT