On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:31:37 +0200, Gorm Haug Eriksen <gormer@opera.com> wrote: > I think Allamarajus issue is valid. Having closely tied browser > specifications that are not implementable in the browser is questionable. What do you mean with this? > We should discuss further if the specification can be relaxed with > regards to property reading or if we should require that this > specification must be implementable in user side JavaScript. The former doesn't really help interoperability, the latter has never been a goal. > IMO using proprietary Firefox extensions is not really an option. > JavaScript already support 'watch', but I don't think this is widely > implemented (e.g. Opera doesn't support it). ECMAScript 4 will also have support for getters and setters (hopefully compatible with what Firefox and Safari have today) which will most likely make this possible. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 10:59:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT