On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:45:27 +0200, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > Good there is a conformance section in your document but which is a bit > dry, maybe once you have defined your class of products, you could > define what does that mean to be conformant to XMLHttpRequest. Added the following: conforming implementation A UA that implements all interfaces described in this specification and follows all MUST-, REQUIRED- and SHALL-level of critera in this specification. conforming document A document that follows all MUST-, REQUIRED- and SHALL-level of critera in this specification that apply to document authors. conforming authoring tool One that produces conforming documents. Now the last two are probably a bit meaningless as I've heard various people say that it's virtually impossible to check if a document is conforming once scripting is involved, but having them doesn't hurt I think. I'm also happy with dropping them though. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 17:47:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT