Re: ACTION-148: responseText and encoding

On Sun, 14 May 2006 14:25:01 +0200, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote:
> This is another difference that is not compatible with existing  
> implementations, why is the 3 not a SHOULD? to meet the goals of being  
> compatible with existing implementations.
>
> Which is a seperate issue I know, but it hasn't been resolved from when  
> I raised it last time...

You got a reply  
http://www.w3.org/mid/op.s9jem2h364w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com on that  
one. Please keep that issue out of this thread.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Sunday, 14 May 2006 12:32:05 UTC