W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Headers / caches proposal (revised)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:56:25 -0700
Message-Id: <E3D76844-3A1F-4C30-9407-5EF9A4133905@apple.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>


On May 2, 2006, at 6:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

>
> On May 2, 2006, at 6:11 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2006/05/02, at 1:33 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>> Combining these lists, your list does not include Connection,  
>>> Upgrade, Expect, Via, From, Max-Forwards or Proxy-Authorization.  
>>> Are you convinced all those are safe? Do you think my specific  
>>> justifications for Connection, Upgrade and Expect were wrong?
>>
>> WRT Connection: Mark Baker made an argument that someone may  
>> design an extension that is hop-by-hop, and therefore needs to be  
>> added to Connection. Note that the proposal doesn't allow it to be  
>> overwritten; only appended to.

BTW, I don't think "only appended to" solves it, since one of the  
anticipated problems is that "Close" could be added and may break an  
existing persistent connection.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 01:56:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT