On Mar 16, 2006, at 3:28 AM, Ian Davis wrote: > > On 16/03/2006 11:26, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> My suggestion would be to do nothing for "version 1.0" and use the >> error event in "version 2.0" as noted in some comment in the >> source code... >> From what I recall this is more or less what we agreed to do >> anyways... > > I recall the same from our face to face. Version 1.0 needs to be > documenting what content authors can rely on when working with XHR > today. I also agree with this approach. Regards, MaciejReceived on Thursday, 16 March 2006 19:00:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:53 GMT