W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:15:01 +0200
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s8eg7bfx64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:44:53 +0200, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote:
> [...]
>
> What is IDL? say it. "Interface Definition Language"

I replaced `IDL` with `<abbr title="Interface Definition  
Language">IDL</abbr>` in the source code.


> DOM 3 Core, that you reference, is using OMG IDL. Maybe that would be a  
> good choice considering you are referring to Dom Core as well.

Please see http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/issues/44 for a discussion  
on that. You're welcome to contribute. I think we currently thought of the  
following solutions:

(1) Use OMG IDL and modify the draft for a bit.
     (This might be not possible, forgot the details.)
(2) Write up our own ODL specification and publish it
     as a note.
(3) Assume people will understand it and put all the
     useful stuff in the language bindings.


> [...]
>
> There are also a few typos in the document.

I'd love to fix them, pointers?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 22 April 2006 08:15:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT