On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:38:05 +0200, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote: > This is very silly, the VendorMember scheme is entirely stupid, it's > completely useless for authors, we can't do anything with it, and is > much worse than simple invented terms that eventually get standardised. I didn't really like it either, I was hoping for comments :-) It seems extensibility in the DOM in general is a bit unaddressed. > [...] > > Extension requirements similar to ECMAScript would be a much more > logical approach. Pointer? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 20:42:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT