"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> > I didn't really like it either, I was hoping for comments :-) It seems > extensibility in the DOM in general is a bit unaddressed. Yep, :-( >> Extension requirements similar to ECMAScript would be a much more >> logical approach. > > Pointer? Well it pretty much says "do what you want!" http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-262.pdf section 2 A conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to provide additional types, values, objects, properties, and functions beyond those described in this specification. In particular, a conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to provide properties not described in this specification, and values for those properties, for objects that are described in this specification. A conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to support program and regular expression syntax not described in this specification. In particular, a conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to support program syntax that makes use of the "future reserved words" listed in 7.5.3 of this specification.Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 20:59:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT