W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive?

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:38:59 +0000 (UTC)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0604211936340.21459@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> There's a place for making sure you have a path from the current 
> implementations to the new standard, but this isn't it. Specifying this 
> behaviour well isn't going to cost anything; some implementations won't 
> be conformant for a little while, but fixing them won't break any 
> existing applications.
> 
> Besides which, each of those implementations does a different thing; how 
> do you accurately represent that?

I wasn't saying the spec had to represent what happens _today_, that's 
obviously impossible since the implementations differ. My point was that 
one of the implementors told you "we might never be able to do this" and 
yet it was still being considered.

Once an implementor says "can't happen", especially if they give quite 
simple and clear reasons, there's no point going in that direction any 
more. In this particular case, it means there's no point requiring "put" 
to be sent as "put" instead of "PUT" because an implementor has informed 
you that implementors use network libraries that are outside their 
controls and these libraries sometimes convert "put" to "PUT".

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 19:39:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT