On Apr 20, 2006, at 02:20, Cameron McCormack wrote: > leaning towards B just because it's more easily implemented, and I > can't > think of a valid reason for caring about whether "Tab" was > specified as > a modifier or not, especially if there is no way to get the list of > all > modifiers in effect. I could imagine tiny implementations that would > want to avoid storing strings for modifier keys, and would favour just > storing (1) as a bitfield, but DOM 3 keyboard events are already > pretty > string heavy. I think B is the only option here, no one is ever going to write an application that actually has the knowledge to differentiate between the 1 and 2. And if someone did it, I'm sure the following week some weirdo would come up with a keyboard on which Tab can be used as a modifier too. I don't think that storing as a bit-field is all that important in Tiny, it wouldn't optimise much. Besides, the Tiny subset of keyboard events don't have getModifierState() ATM. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/Received on Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:18:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT