Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments

On Apr 20, 2006, at 01:57, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> If an implementation of the interface does not have the handleEvent
> method, then I don't think it's an implementation of that  
> interface.  If
> on* attributes and ES Function objects are mapped to EventListener
> objects behind the scenes (even just conceptually) then it would be OK
> just to refer to the EventListener interface here.

It's the other way around in fact, the EventListener is mapped to  
Function (and currently, not give a handleEvent member, though I  
think it would be better to have one pointing back to the object  
itself, for compatibility with at least ASV and possibly other SVG UAs).

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:14:23 UTC