- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:59:24 +0900
- To: public-webapi@w3.org
Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "Window Object 1.0"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-Window-20060407/
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 17:19:28 GMT
First WD
We understand that is a first Working Draft, but please when you cite
a reference to another document do not leave empty the references.
It's not very practical to check the document and have the grasp of
the intented meaning when reviewed and/or read.
[[[
Need to be able to include organization and date for references.
Need appropriate cites for DOM Core and OMG IDL.
Need titles and authors for DOM2Views
Need titles and authors for DOM3Core
Need titles and authors for ECMAScript
Need titles and authors for Java
DOM2Views
,
DOM3Core
,
DOM3EV
Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 Events Specification,
Philippe Le Hégaret (W3C), and Tom Pixley (Netscape Communications
Corporation).
ECMAScript
,
Java
,
]]]
-- Window Object 1.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-Window-20060407/#bibref
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 17:19:28 GMT
Because we are on the topic of references, make sure to distinguish
normative references and informative references.
-> See "Make a list of normative references"
http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-norm-principle
-> See "When imposing requirements by normative references, address
conformance dependencies."
http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice
This last one had consequences recently on some specifications at
later stage. Be very careful with your normative references and the
consequences.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 14 April 2006 02:59:44 UTC