W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget?

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 06:27:47 -0700
Message-ID: <44390BD3.90608@sicking.cc>
To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Cc: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>

>> 2. It solves the problem of "what type is onreadystatechange in the  idl"
>>
>> It does feel like this is a pretty poor argument. We would be going  
>> against the original intent of the spec for what feels like  editorial 
>> reasons. If this is the only reason then I'd like to find  another 
>> solution.
> 
> I'll note once more that this problem was solved a long time ago by  DOM 
> Events, so it's not even an argument.

Sorry, I had missed that there is a solution.

So what type should we put in the IDL that works for both ECMAScript and 
Java? (or do you have a link to where someone already explained it?)

/ Jonas
Received on Sunday, 9 April 2006 13:27:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT