>> 2. It solves the problem of "what type is onreadystatechange in the idl" >> >> It does feel like this is a pretty poor argument. We would be going >> against the original intent of the spec for what feels like editorial >> reasons. If this is the only reason then I'd like to find another >> solution. > > I'll note once more that this problem was solved a long time ago by DOM > Events, so it's not even an argument. Sorry, I had missed that there is a solution. So what type should we put in the IDL that works for both ECMAScript and Java? (or do you have a link to where someone already explained it?) / JonasReceived on Sunday, 9 April 2006 13:27:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT