W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:25:57 +0200
To: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s7m3ljtt64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:38:58 +0200, Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>  
wrote:
>> I'm fine with adding all kinds of methods people and their dog find  
>> interesting.
>> (If the group agrees, which I think they have...) Some pointers and  
>> guidance would be appreciated though.
>
> I think that, as Mark says (and as I recall we agreed at our f2f), any  
> verb that's syntactically correct needs to be allowed. That way folks  
> can start implementing other HTTP derived protocols without the browser  
> having to support them natively.

Right, I'm looking for explicit spec. changes :-)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 13:26:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT