W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods?

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:38:58 +0200
Message-Id: <CBA4B6F6-38B4-4A7E-AE6B-C00F46CFD95F@expway.fr>
To: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>

On Apr 06, 2006, at 11:50, Web APIs Issue Tracker wrote:
> I'm fine with adding all kinds of methods people and their dog find  
> interesting.
> (If the group agrees, which I think they have...) Some pointers and  
> guidance
> would be appreciated though.

I think that, as Mark says (and as I recall we agreed at our f2f),  
any verb that's syntactically correct needs to be allowed. That way  
folks can start implementing other HTTP derived protocols without the  
browser having to support them natively.

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 13:38:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:20 UTC