Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:28:09 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >>>> If that is indeed true we need to fix it I agree. Is there a >>>> sensible value we could set .status to for example? >>> >>> >>> Lets keep .status an HTTP status code. What about dispatching an >>> abort event on the object as I suggested? Not sure if that's >>> appropriate for this version though... >> >> >> We have already talked about setting .status to -1 in some error >> conditions. Aborting is arguably an error condition. > > I don't like that idea. I believe we also opted not to do it given that > people might depend on the way .status acts now in certain error > conditions. It also makes the attribute unnecessary complex. I don't think we have addressed error handling yet, so we should just include this case when we decide that. / JonasReceived on Friday, 7 April 2006 07:32:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT