On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:28:09 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >>> If that is indeed true we need to fix it I agree. Is there a sensible >>> value we could set .status to for example? >> >> Lets keep .status an HTTP status code. What about dispatching an abort >> event on the object as I suggested? Not sure if that's appropriate for >> this version though... > > We have already talked about setting .status to -1 in some error > conditions. Aborting is arguably an error condition. I don't like that idea. I believe we also opted not to do it given that people might depend on the way .status acts now in certain error conditions. It also makes the attribute unnecessary complex. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 09:41:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT