Hello all... I just read a new CNET article ( http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5074799.html?tag=fd_top ) that detailed the Microsoft / Eolas case, and in it Michael Wallent (a general manager in the Windows Division) urges developers to use alternate means of delivery of content just in case they don't prevail in their appeals. Then, the article went further: "Wallent cited CNN.com as an example of a site that uses Macromedia Flash--a technology many consider particularly vulnerable to the patent's claims--in a non-infringing way." I glanced a bit at the current CNN.com site and didn't see anything different about how they were using Flash; does anyone know what he's talking about? Jeff Stevens jfstevens@virginia-homes.comReceived on Thursday, 11 September 2003 16:01:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:07:55 GMT