W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-plugins@w3.org > September 2003

prior art and obvious.

From: Alex Rivero <arivero@unizar.es>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:45:57 +0200
To: "web-plugins" <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200309021845.23744.arivero@unizar.es>

  I believe most of the things we are speaking about are not
straight prior art, but they can -should- be used to claim
obviousness. As far as I understand, if it can be showed,
based on prior inventions, that the patent claims are
obvious for any engineer, then the patent is invalid.
Is this the plan?
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 12:46:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:03 UTC