- From: Domenic Denicola <web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:22:52 GMT
- To: public-web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org
> should we s/.dedicatedworker.html/-dedicatedworker.html/ and s/.sharedworker.html/-sharedworker.html/? It seems wrong to use dots in filenames when not triggering some kind framework feature. I've been using this for streams, but sure, I see your point. Renaming works fine. > Also, s/serialization-via-notifications-api.any.js/serialization-via-notifications-api-manual.any.js/ since permissions cannot be automated yet? Somehow I still got these tests to crash Chrome and produce an error in Firefox in their current form. I guess because per https://notifications.spec.whatwg.org/#constructors the "create a notification" step runs before the in-parallel permission business. > BroadcastChannel that partially fails and partially succeeds How are you sure that these two workers are "suspendable workers", per https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-broadcastchannel-postmessage step 7 bullet 1 sub-bullet 2? Assumign the test is OK, can we also test the other properties of the MessageEvent for the messageerror case? View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/5003#issuecomment-297406072
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2017 13:23:05 UTC