W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Issues list for Resource Timing

From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:20:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOYaDdPvR5qNf-beJ2v+aetrPAfCi1s2A=r_3q=tZTuhXF9Y1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Yes I'll take a look this week.
Arvind


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> I summarized the status of issues related to Resource Timing since June
> 2012 at
>  http://www.w3.org/2013/11/cr-resource-timing.html
>
>
> There a few that needs our attention since I wasn't able to find a clear
> conclusion. Arvind, Jatinder, if you can have a look at those 5 issues
> before the f2f, we could probably avoid spending face-to-face time on
> them.
> - A resource request without a network connection (James Simonsen)
> - Resource request: failure and success? (Andy Davies)
> - Missing example to avoid buffer overflow? (Nic Jansma)
> - Need to define "networking layer" (Boris Zbarsky)
> - resourcetimingbufferfull is supposed to clear the buffer (Juan Carlos
> Estibariz)
>
> We're already aware of the following one and will reach a conclusion at
> the f2f. Note that this is related to the issue raised by Juan Carlos
> (see above).
> - onresourcetimingbufferfull attribute type and event listeners
> (Christophe Dumez)
>
> We pushed the following issues to resource timing level 2:
> - audio and video support
> - HTTP and spdy
> - Web worker initiator type and resources in web worker
>
> Do we have a test for the following?
> - 304 responses (Arvind Jain)
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 22:20:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:37 UTC