W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Adding protocol information to Resource Timing

From: (wrong string) 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:56:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYi+qB9ttRwvLcZ_VZ5DmbJPCyH-eFr+EC0YO14o8tSfVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
Cc: James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>, "McCall, Mike" <mmccall@akamai.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, "Jain, Shakesh" <shjain@akamai.com>
Sorry, I'm less familiar here. Can someone clarify which server knows what?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote:
> I agree with James. There's the case where RUM collection is done by a third
> party but even there, this info could be collected outside of the resource
> timing API.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:52 PM, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> I can't speak for everyone, but my opinion is that Resource Timing should
>> not repeat information that the server already knows. You should be able to
>> record the protocol on the server side.
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, McCall, Mike <mmccall@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> After some internal discussions, a colleague recently started a
>>> thread[1] on the spdy-dev mailing list, asking about having an interface
>>> for developers to leverage to determine whether or not a web page
>>> resource
>>> was fetched via SPDY (or in the future, HTTP 2.0).
>>>
>>> Since the Resource Timing specification already enumerates the resources
>>> for a
>>> given page, it seems like it would make sense to also include which
>>> protocol was used to fetch a given resource.
>>>
>>> What does the group think?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/spdy-dev/ERaEDaTnt7w
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 10:53:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:34 UTC