I agree with James. There's the case where RUM collection is done by a third party but even there, this info could be collected outside of the resource timing API. On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:52 PM, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>wrote: > I can't speak for everyone, but my opinion is that Resource Timing should > not repeat information that the server already knows. You should be able to > record the protocol on the server side. > > James > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, McCall, Mike <mmccall@akamai.com> wrote: > >> After some internal discussions, a colleague recently started a >> thread[1] on the spdy-dev mailing list, asking about having an interface >> for developers to leverage to determine whether or not a web page resource >> was fetched via SPDY (or in the future, HTTP 2.0). >> >> Since the Resource Timing specification already enumerates the resources >> for a >> given page, it seems like it would make sense to also include which >> protocol was used to fetch a given resource. >> >> What does the group think? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mike >> >> 1. >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/spdy-dev/ERaEDaTnt7w >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 23:33:08 UTC