W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > January 2013

RE: New Resource and User Timing Test Cases

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:13:25 +0000
To: "Boris Zbarsky (bzbarsky@mit.edu)" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "James Simonsen (simonjam@chromium.org)" <simonjam@chromium.org>
CC: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0d0c341c028c40b58223d488360e5732@BLUPR03MB065.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Boris, James,

Can one of you review the Resource and User Timing test cases? I'd like to move them from the submitted folder to the approved folder if there are no issues with the tests.

Thanks,
Jatinder

From: Jatinder Mann
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 1:02 PM
To: public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: New Resource and User Timing Test Cases


I have submitted new Resource and User Timing test cases and have updated the Page Visibility test cases to fix some bugs. Please review these test cases and provide feedback.



Resource Timing Test Cases:

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/ResourceTiming/test_resource_timing.htm



IE10 passes all test cases.



User Timing Test Cases:

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_clear_marks.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_clear_measures.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_exists.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_mark.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_mark_exceptions.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_measure.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_measure_exceptions.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/UserTiming/test_user_timing_measure_navigation_timing.htm



IE10 passes all tests cases.



Page Visibility Test Cases:

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/PageVisibility/test_attributes_exist.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/PageVisibility/test_child_document.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/PageVisibility/test_default_view.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/PageVisibility/test_minimize.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/PageVisibility/test_read_only.htm

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/PageVisibility/test_tab_state_change.htm



IE10 passes all test cases. Firefox and Chrome fail these test cases, but I believe it's because they have a prefixed implementation.



Thanks,

Jatinder
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2013 20:18:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:34 UTC