W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > January 2013

[minutes] Web Performance WG Teleconference #92 2013-01-09

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:59:55 +0000
To: "'public-web-perf@w3.org'" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f874a7da740b459490f3047aa3874294@BLUPR03MB065.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Meeting Summary:



1.       Charter

Philippe will submit the new charter for review with the AC reps, http://www.w3.org/wiki/Web_Performance/Charter. We expect that this process will take one or two months and members will need to re-join the working group at that time. At that time, we can begin publishing the new specifications as FPWD. Though, editors should feel free to discuss their draft proposals on the conference call during this period.



2.       Navigation and High Resolution Time to Rec

As of December 17, 2012, Navigation Timing and High Resolution Time were published as Recommendation.



3.       Resource Timing, User Timing, Performance Timeline

The Resource Timing, User Timing and Performance Timeline test cases have been submitted by Microsoft. There hasn't been any feedback on these test cases and they should be moved to the approved folder. User Timing and Performance Timeline specifications do not have any open feedback issues remaining, with Resource Timing have one discussion on duplicate resources. We expect to move this specification to PR in 2 months.



4.       Page Visibility

Page Visibility specification has no remaining open issues. There is one test bug that needs to be fixed with the test cases and potentially a new test case to submit. Those test case issues should be resolved in a week. We expect to move Page Visibility to PR in 1 month.



5.       RequestAnimationFrame

The last remaining issue on this spec will be closed down this week. Test cases have been submitted for this specification, and there are three implementations. We plan to move this specification to CR in 3 months.



6.       New Specifications

Editors are encouraged to share proposals for the new specifications with the working group and discuss their specification ideas on the conference calls and mailing list. We plan to publish the new specifications as FPWD in 2 months.




W3C Web Performance WG Teleconference #92 2013-01-09



IRC log: http://www.w3.org/2013/01/09-webperf-irc



Meeting Minutes: http://www.w3.org/2013/01/09-webperf-minutes.html



Attendees

Jatinder Mann, Philippe Le Hegaret, Ganesh Rao, Daniel Austin


Scribe

Jatinder Mann



Agenda

1.       Discuss Charter

2.       Review open issues on existing specifications

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Minutes:
Charter Text

http://www.w3.org/wiki/Web_Performance/Charter

Plh: When should we be able to move Page Visibility to PR?

Jatinder: I have one test case to update and another to submit. We should be able to move to Page Visibility to PR in 1 month.

Plh: What about requestAnimationFrame?

Jatinder: There was one last remaining issue on animationStartTime. I believe we should have that closed this week.

Plh: Let's target moving requestAnimationFrame to CR in 3 months.

Jatinder: That works.

test.org/webperf/tests/submission/W3C/NavigationTiming/monolitic.html

http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/W3C/NavigationTiming/monolitic.html

<plh> http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/approved/navigation-timing/html5/test_document_readiness_exist.html

Plh: I'm going to submit the updated charter to the AC reps. We should expect that the new charter will be in place in 1-2 months. We can aim to publish the new specifications as FPWD at that time
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2013 19:03:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:34 UTC