- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:32:03 -0500
- To: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
- Cc: Nat Duca <nduca@chromium.org>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 16:52 -0800, James Robinson wrote: > > Should requestAnimationFrame tick on display:none iframes? > > > > A simple test: > > > http://www.jankfree.com/raf/iframes_and_visibility_when_hidden.html > > > > FF and Chrome differ: > > - FF doesn't tick > > - Webkit does > > > > Not sure what IE does. > > > > And, what do we think is "correct"? > > Just to make sure we're closing the loop here. Section 5 of > the > processing model [1] indicates that if the context is not > visible > (hidden is true), no callback happens. > See also the response from James in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2012Oct/0033.html > > No, that's not correct at all. > Then, my issues list is incorrect and we haven't really addressed Nat Duca's issue. Can you look at the short thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2012Jul/0001.html and see if we need to do anything? Thank you, Philippe
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 13:33:08 UTC