W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [requestAnimationFrame] Spec to LC?

From: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:52:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD73mdJXWNjPYmBzzH3nXLG=dvG78igZaWd5W52yvsZvQ9YBWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Cc: "cam@mcc.id.au" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  James, Cameron,****
>
> ** **
>
> Do you feel that the requestAnimationFrame spec is ready to move to Last
> Call? In today’s working group conf call, we were discussing the status of
> all specifications and noticed that there are no remaining open issues on
> this particular spec. ****
>
> ** **
>
> The IE Test Center has a few requestAnimationFrame tests from a few months
> ago -
> http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/#perfPaintNotification. I
> am looking to update the tests to match the current spec status and submit
> them for the requestAnimationFrame test suite in the near future.
>

Hello,

I've resolved the remaining open issues and think going to Last Call is a
great idea.  I'm also excited about having a test suite.
http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/#perfPaintNotification looks
like a good start, but it seems a bit out of date (for example it tests for
a animationStartTime property that has never existed in a W3C spec).

- James

****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Jatinder****
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 23:53:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 February 2012 23:53:18 GMT