W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [PageVisibility] Spec review

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:14:09 +0100
To: Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, "Jatinder Mann" <jmann@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <op.v83qxvis64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:00:58 +0100, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>  
>> Other specs only say "The X attribute", not "The X IDL attribute".  
>> Should we simplify this spec?
> Being more specific in a specification is only a good thing. Besides,  
> HTML5 spec also uses similar terminology.

I believe HTML only uses it when disambiguation is required. E.g. the DOM  
standard most certainly does not use it as it is not required at all  
there. I would say the APIs you develop are much closer to the DOM  
standard than to HTML.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 12:14:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:32 UTC