- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:16:46 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 19:58 -0700, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:29:42 -0700, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 23:11 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> 4. I think it would be better if the DOM dependency was on > >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html as that is what > >> we want implementors to implement. > > > > Ideally yes, but that spec won't be ready for 2 or 3 years. We're only > > depending on the name "Document" so whether we reference DOM3Core or > > DOMCore won't make a difference to implementers. Once DOMCore becomes > > stable, we could easily rev page visibility to reference it. > > You reference HTML. HTML depends on DOM Core. Lets not play games. ;-) Yes, and we're going to ask for an exception for that one. We only reference HTML5 for its top level browsing context definition. Philippe
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2011 11:16:57 UTC