W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > July 2011

Re: [PageVisibility] Feedback

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:58:51 -0700
To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vy3rwed664w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:29:42 -0700, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 23:11 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> 4. I think it would be better if the DOM dependency was on
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html as that is what
>> we want implementors to implement.
>
> Ideally yes, but that spec won't be ready for 2 or 3 years. We're only
> depending on the name "Document" so whether we reference DOM3Core or
> DOMCore won't make a difference to implementers. Once DOMCore becomes
> stable, we could easily rev page visibility to reference it.

You reference HTML. HTML depends on DOM Core. Lets not play games. ;-)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2011 02:59:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 24 July 2011 02:59:40 GMT