W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [minutes] 20110126 Web Performance WG

From: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:49:17 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinFT4xgyeTb6=J9gJQTA8ShqsYw60ZeFkg9i2JO@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anderson Quach <aquach@microsoft.com>
Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
We have two tests for consideration:

1. http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Google/NavigationTiming/test_document_open.htm
Waits until all times are available and caches them. Then does a
document.write() to blow away the entire document. Tests that timings
were not changed.

2. http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Google/NavigationTiming/test_navigate_within_document.htm
Waits until all times are available and caches them. Then appends a
URL fragment (#1) to location.href. Tests that timings were not

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com> wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the new tests.
>> test_performance_attributes_exist.htm
>> test_readwrite.htm
>> test_timing_client_redirect.htm
> The third test which tests that the navigation type is TYPE_NAVIGATE
> isn't correct. If I reload the page, it fails because the navigation
> type is correctly TYPE_RELOAD. The three navigation types each need
> tests which navigate an iframe using location.href='page2.html' for
> TYPE_NAVIGATE, location.reload() for TYPE_RELOAD and history.back()
> for TYPE_BACK_FORWARD. We can't rely on any test of navigation type in
> the main frame.
>> test_unique_performance_objects.htm
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:50:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:29 UTC