W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > December 2010

RE: [NavigationTiming] Move window.performance to navigator.performance

From: Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:17:30 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikHp3GnCYZTSEskdVOXRD_COE6hTgWy1Ou5TsU3@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-web-perf@w3.org
> ii. The risks as outlined in Zhiheng's response and in our previous study on high traffic sites were found to be low for the name "performance".
> iii. When analyzing the occurrences of pagePerformance, the analysis came back inconclusive, no concrete instances of "var pagePerformance" or "var webPerformance" were found.

Does that really make the analysis inconclusive, or is
`pagePerformance` just less risky? It seems to me that the use of
`pagePerformance` or `webPerformance` would simply avoid a lot of
problems.
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 13:28:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:29 UTC