Re: [minutes] 20101201 Web Performance Working Group

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:45:44 +0100, Anderson Quach <
> Anderson.Quach@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>  AndersonQuach: feedback, we should include: title of tests, description of
>> tests, objective, and clear pass / fail criteria.
>> ... would recommend that we pursue self-contained tests until we need a
>> common infrastructure for testing async behavior and etc.
>>
>
> I agree with self-contained, but using the standard harness is also good,
> as this allows us to integrate the tests into our framework without touching
> the test itself, we just replace the harness with our own. Not quite sure if
> that was mentioned. For the same reason, it would be good if tests used
> relative paths from the root (/resources/testharness.js) instead of absolute
> paths (http://test.w3.org/resources/testharness.js).
>

    Good idea. I've changed the test and also added local copy of the
harness files.

cheers,
Zhiheng



>
> --
> Sigbjørn Vik
> Quality Assurance
> Opera Software
>
>