W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [minutes] 20101201 Web Performance Working Group

From: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:08:35 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3Bxqi0WBed8eaf77HK+mMscanPNezJnosjzri@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com>
Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:45:44 +0100, Anderson Quach <
> Anderson.Quach@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>  AndersonQuach: feedback, we should include: title of tests, description of
>> tests, objective, and clear pass / fail criteria.
>> ... would recommend that we pursue self-contained tests until we need a
>> common infrastructure for testing async behavior and etc.
>>
>
> I agree with self-contained, but using the standard harness is also good,
> as this allows us to integrate the tests into our framework without touching
> the test itself, we just replace the harness with our own. Not quite sure if
> that was mentioned. For the same reason, it would be good if tests used
> relative paths from the root (/resources/testharness.js) instead of absolute
> paths (http://test.w3.org/resources/testharness.js).
>

    Good idea. I've changed the test and also added local copy of the
harness files.

cheers,
Zhiheng



>
> --
> Sigbjørn Vik
> Quality Assurance
> Opera Software
>
>
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 22:09:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:29 UTC